Both keep feature voting simple. They differ on what happens after the vote.
Nolt and Upvoted are the two tools people shortlist once they have decided a full product-management suite is overkill. Both give you a public board, voting and a roadmap without a sales call, and both can be live the same afternoon you sign up. If your shortlist is these two, you have already made the important decision.
The difference shows up in scope. Nolt is focused on the board itself and prices per board. Upvoted treats the board as one part of a loop that runs from collecting feedback through to telling people what shipped, and prices the account rather than each board on it.
That sounds like an accounting detail until you launch a second product. With per-board pricing, every new board is a new line item, which quietly discourages the thing you should be doing: giving each product its own place for feedback instead of one board where three audiences argue past each other. Teams on per-board plans tend to end up with one overloaded board, and the vote counts stop meaning anything.
The second difference is what the board does after someone votes. In Upvoted a request carries its voters with it through Planned and In Progress to Shipped, and the release note that closes it is sent to exactly the people who asked. The board is not just a queue you read, it is a list of customers to talk to when the work lands.
None of which makes Nolt a bad choice. It is a genuinely well-made product with a clear point of view, and if what you want is the best-looking board with the least configuration on it, that is a real answer to a real question.
Compared on the things that do not change every quarter. For current prices, check both pricing pages, they move.
| Nolt | Upvoted | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per board, so a second product means a second subscription | Per account, with unlimited boards on Max |
| Running several products | Each board billed separately | Unlimited boards on Max, on one bill |
| Feature gating | Tiered, some capabilities sit on higher plans | Pro for one product, Max adds integrations and advanced board features |
| Internal vs public votes | All votes counted the same | Collaborator votes tracked separately from public ones |
| Changelog | Roadmap-focused | Roadmap and release notes in the same place |
| Closing the loop | You announce it | Voters on the request are notified when it ships |
| Embedding | Board link and widget | One-line script widget, plus API and webhooks |
Nolt is a design-led feature voting board. It is deliberately small in scope and it looks the part.
Feature voting, a public roadmap and a changelog, from one account.
Moving a Nolt board across is mostly a copy of the posts and their vote counts, which is the part people worry about losing. Votes carry over attached to the requests they belong to, so the ranking you have built up over months does not reset to zero on the day you switch.
The link you have already shared is the other half. Swap the board URL in your docs, your onboarding emails and your in-app menu for the new Upvoted board, or drop the Upvoted widget in where the old one sat. Most teams do the import and the link swap in the same sitting.
The 7-day trial includes every Max feature, so you see the whole product before choosing a plan.